# Reading roadmap: Quadratic stabilization of the canonical Foulkes--Howe map

The manuscript expresses the specified canonical map as multiplication in an invariant tensor algebra. An annihilator criterion reduces surjectivity to vanishing of symmetric multilinear forms on products. A directional-derivative injectivity lemma and two differentiation sequences surround an induction on the number of slots, yielding the stated degree range. Complete reducibility then supplies a representation embedding in the opposite direction.

Source SHA-256: `89b46306d4bc756ff5fc261deaf3075ce1afa37087a313bab7abaf1569b8af21`. Indexed 24,462 characters.

Edges point from prerequisite to consumer. Solid proof edges are attributed inferences, not formal certificates; references remain candidates.

## Specify the canonical image

Use averaging and multiplication to define the map and its image, then express surjectivity through an annihilator.

Claims: thm:main, sec:map

## Establish one-step injectivity

Use adjoint directional derivatives and a norm identity on homogeneous spaces.

Claims: lem:shift

## Run the slot induction

Combine binary splitting, two derivative sequences and the induction hypothesis to obtain multilinear vanishing.

Claims: prop:vanishing, thm:main

## Derive the representation comparison

Split the surjection equivariantly and state the scope of the construction.

Claims: cor:comparison, remark:line:462

## Internal claim index

### Theorem 1 — `thm:main`

Source lines 99–104.

Apply the local multilinear vanishing proposition to the annihilator criterion for the canonical image, giving the stated surjectivity range.

- `prop:vanishing` (proof_dependency; source_audit_annotation): The theorem proof invokes the local vanishing proposition.
- `sec:map` (proof_dependency; source_audit_annotation): The theorem proof applies the canonical-image annihilator criterion.

Candidate references: `eq:map` (internal_reference); `prop:vanishing` (candidate_proof_dependency); `sec:map` (candidate_proof_dependency).

### Lemma 2 — `lem:shift`

Source lines 260–266.

Make opposite directional derivatives adjoints under the monomial factorial inner product. Their commutator gives the degree difference, so the norm identity forces a zero kernel when the source degree exceeds the destination degree.


Candidate references: `external:AldazRender` (external_reference).

### Proposition 3 — `prop:vanishing`

Source lines 304–314.

Induct on the number of slots. Binary splitting yields a common-product identity; a first derivative sequence frees the last slot, induction separates the other products, and a second sequence removes their shared power within the degree bound.

- `lem:shift` (proof_dependency; source_audit_annotation): The first sequence checks source and destination degrees and applies injectivity at each step.
- `sec:map` (proof_dependency; source_audit_annotation): The final step uses the earlier polarization proof that pure powers span the symmetric power.

Candidate references: `eq:diagonal` (candidate_proof_dependency); `eq:binary` (candidate_proof_dependency); `lem:shift` (candidate_proof_dependency); `eq:inductive-vanishing` (candidate_proof_dependency); `eq:second-composition` (candidate_proof_dependency); `sec:map` (candidate_proof_dependency).

### Corollary 4 — `cor:comparison`

Source lines 440–449.

Use the main theorem’s equivariant surjection and complete reducibility to choose an invariant complement to its kernel; invert the restriction to construct the claimed embedding.

- `thm:main` (proof_dependency; source_audit_annotation): The corollary uses the main theorem’s surjective map and its equivariance.
- `external:Macdonald` (proof_dependency; source_audit_annotation): The cited complete-reducibility result supplies the invariant complement used to split the surjection.

Candidate references: `thm:main` (candidate_proof_dependency); `external:Macdonald` (external_reference).

### Remark 5 — `remark:line:462`

Source lines 462–472.

State that the degree comparisons are independent of dimension and list the written proof’s use of the Fischer inner product, splitting over C and nonzero characteristic-zero scalar factors.

## External inputs and references

### [1] AldazRender — `external:AldazRender`

Source lines 474–479.

J.~M.~Aldaz and H.~Render, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s13324-023-00844-4}{A Fischer type decomposition theorem from the apolar inner product}, Analysis and Mathematical Physics 13 (2023), article~91.

Fischer/apolar Hermitian inner-product construction employed in the local injectivity proof; its normalization and adjointness are supplied in the manuscript.

Role: **used**. Expanded native manuscript lines 267–277. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.


Candidate references: `lem:shift` (external_reference).

### [2] Brion1993 — `external:Brion1993`

Source lines 479–484.

M.~Brion, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026558}{Stable properties of plethysm: on two conjectures of Foulkes}, Manuscripta Mathematica 80 (1993), no.~4, 347--371.

Earlier eventual surjectivity in the stabilization problem.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 114–128. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): Earlier eventual surjectivity in the stabilization problem.

Candidate references: `sec:introduction` (external_reference).

### [3] Brion — `external:Brion`

Source lines 484–491.

M.~Brion, \href{https://smf.emath.fr/publications/sur-certains-modules-gradues-associes-aux-produits-symetriques}{Sur certains modules gradu\'es associ\'es aux produits sym\'etriques}, in Alg\`ebre non commutative, groupes quantiques et invariants (Reims, 1995), S\'eminaires et Congr\`es 2, Soci\'et\'e Math\'ematique de France, Paris, 1997, 157--183.

Earlier effective bound depending on degree and dimension.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 114–128. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): Earlier effective bound depending on degree and dimension.

Candidate references: `sec:introduction` (external_reference).

### [4] CIM — `external:CIM`

Source lines 491–497.

M.-W.~Cheung, C.~Ikenmeyer, and S.~Mkrtchyan, \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2016.09.002}{Symmetrizing tableaux and the 5th case of the Foulkes conjecture}, Journal of Symbolic Computation 80 (2017), part~3, 833--843. \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03944v1}{arXiv:1509.03944v1}.

Diagonal examples distinguishing specified canonical-map invertibility from ordinary representation comparison.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 140–145. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): Diagonal examples distinguishing specified canonical-map invertibility from ordinary representation comparison.

Candidate references: `sec:introduction` (external_reference).

### [5] Foulkes1950 — `external:Foulkes1950`

Source lines 497–503.

H.~O.~Foulkes, \href{https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-25.3.205}{Concomitants of the quintic and sextic up to degree four in the coefficients of the ground form}, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 25 (1950), no.~3, 205--209.

The ordinary Foulkes representation-comparison conjecture distinguished from canonical-map surjectivity.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 130–139. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): The ordinary Foulkes representation-comparison conjecture distinguished from canonical-map surjectivity.

Candidate references: `sec:introduction` (external_reference).

### [6] FultonHarris — `external:FultonHarris`

Source lines 503–508.

W.~Fulton and J.~Harris, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9}{Representation Theory: A First Course}, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 129, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.

Classical weight-string interpretation of the injectivity criterion, which is proved locally.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 252–258. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): Classical weight-string interpretation of the injectivity criterion, which is proved locally.

Candidate references: `sec:differential` (external_reference).

### [7] Ikenmeyer — `external:Ikenmeyer`

Source lines 508–513.

C.~Ikenmeyer, On McKay's propagation theorem for the Foulkes conjecture, \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.04957v1}{arXiv:1509.04957v1}, 2015.

Earlier propagation/weight-shift argument compared with the manuscript’s two-sequence induction.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 165–173. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): Earlier propagation/weight-shift argument compared with the manuscript’s two-sequence induction.

Candidate references: `sec:introduction` (external_reference); `sec:differential` (external_reference).

### [8] Landsberg — `external:Landsberg`

Source lines 513–520.

J.~M.~Landsberg, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s11565-014-0202-7}{Geometric complexity theory: an introduction for geometers}, Annali dell'Universit\`a di Ferrara 61 (2015), no.~1, 65--117. \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.7387}{arXiv:1305.7387}. Locators refer to the published version.

Chow-variety interpretation and earlier polynomial-bound question.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 107–128. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): Chow-variety interpretation and earlier polynomial-bound question.

Candidate references: `sec:introduction` (external_reference).

### [9] Macdonald — `external:Macdonald`

Source lines 520–525.

I.~G.~Macdonald, \href{https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198534891.001.0001}{Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials}, second edition, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.

Complete reducibility used to choose an invariant complement in the representation corollary.

Role: **used**. Expanded native manuscript lines 453–459. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `cor:comparison` (proof_dependency; source_audit_annotation): The cited complete-reducibility result supplies the invariant complement used to split the surjection.

Candidate references: `cor:comparison` (external_reference).

### [10] McKay — `external:McKay`

Source lines 525–530.

T.~McKay, \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2007.12.003}{On plethysm conjectures of Stanley and Foulkes}, Journal of Algebra 319 (2008), no.~5, 2050--2071.

Earlier propagation theorem described through Ikenmeyer’s formulation.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 165–173. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): Earlier propagation theorem described through Ikenmeyer’s formulation.

Candidate references: `sec:introduction` (external_reference).

### [11] RSW — `external:RSW`

Source lines 530–536.

C.~Raicu, S.~V.~Sam, and J.~Weyman, \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s10013-021-00527-2}{On some modules supported in the Chow variety}, Vietnam Journal of Mathematics 50 (2022), no.~2, 501--521. \href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10910v1}{arXiv:2108.10910v1}. Locators refer to this preprint version.

Canonical-map/Chow-variety conventions and contextual normalization regularity; the local proof establishes its own diagonal criterion.

Role: **background**. Expanded native manuscript lines 87–128. Source role only; the cited original work has not been independently checked for this neutral guide.

- `sec:introduction` (background; source_audit_annotation): Canonical-map/Chow-variety conventions and contextual normalization regularity; the local proof establishes its own diagonal criterion.

Candidate references: `sec:introduction` (external_reference); `sec:map` (external_reference).

## Coverage and limits

{"mode": "native_latex_index", "claims": 5, "sections": 5, "external_references": 11, "source_bibliography_entries": 11, "unresolved_bibliography": 0, "unresolved": 0}

- Reference edges are not certified proof dependencies. Edge direction is prerequisite → consumer.
- Numbers reflect simple source counters; labels and line anchors are authoritative.
- Extractive statements and proof openings are marked; they are not reconstructed proof gists.
- Macros, included files and custom counters require an expanded source or annotated fallback.
