# Independent human assessment worksheet

Quadratic stabilization of the canonical Foulkes–Howe map

Frozen source commit: `1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a`. PDF pages: 7.

This blank worksheet contains no AI correctness verdicts or suggested answers. Complete it independently before opening panel reports or researcher role annotations. The roadmap describes the manuscript’s own argument; it is not an assessment.

Reader: ____________________
Date: ____________________

## First reading

What is the precise main claim, including field, dimension and parameter restrictions?

[Your notes]

What proof route does the manuscript use?

[Your notes]

## Claim-by-claim reading

### Theorem 1 — thm:main

Statement lines 99–104; proof lines 432–437.

Assumptions and conclusion:

[Your notes]

Check the mathematical steps and any calculations:

[Your notes]

Which earlier statements or external results does this proof actually use?

[Your notes]

Any concern: record its exact location and a concrete calculation, counterexample, or missing justification.

[Your notes]

### Lemma 2 — lem:shift

Statement lines 260–266; proof lines 267–292.

Assumptions and conclusion:

[Your notes]

Check the mathematical steps and any calculations:

[Your notes]

Which earlier statements or external results does this proof actually use?

[Your notes]

Any concern: record its exact location and a concrete calculation, counterexample, or missing justification.

[Your notes]

### Proposition 3 — prop:vanishing

Statement lines 304–314; proof lines 315–431.

Assumptions and conclusion:

[Your notes]

Check the mathematical steps and any calculations:

[Your notes]

Which earlier statements or external results does this proof actually use?

[Your notes]

Any concern: record its exact location and a concrete calculation, counterexample, or missing justification.

[Your notes]

### Corollary 4 — cor:comparison

Statement lines 440–449; proof lines 450–461.

Assumptions and conclusion:

[Your notes]

Check the mathematical steps and any calculations:

[Your notes]

Which earlier statements or external results does this proof actually use?

[Your notes]

Any concern: record its exact location and a concrete calculation, counterexample, or missing justification.

[Your notes]

## Source quality and scope

Record any missing text, ambiguous notation, parameter boundary, unsupported attribution, or difference between the stated conclusion and its interpretation.

[Your notes]

## Your independent assessment

Assessment and level of certainty:

[Your notes]

Evidence supporting your assessment:

[Your notes]

Questions that need more work or another source:

[Your notes]