Math RefereeAn independent review notebook
A notebook of claims, arguments and the evidence behind them. Read the manuscript with a roadmap, inspect its prerequisites, and compare your assessment with the referee panel.
A reading map of the manuscript’s argument. Select claims in the full map to inspect their source evidence.
Reading materials and panel assessments have separate views.
The manuscript proposes a uniform zero-free region for finite-order Hecke L-functions over Q(√−3) and for Dirichlet L-functions, including the Riemann zeta function. Its argument passes from cubic theta reflection and Poisson expansion through two moment reductions to the final half-plane.
Reading guide + panel report availableThe manuscript derives facet and product identities for projection-body volume, calculates the simplex benchmark, and compares a product of simplex factors with that benchmark. A final corollary studies dimension-dependent growth.
Reading guide + panel report availableThe manuscript defines a polynomial from a cusp relation and a shifted auxiliary algebra. A local lifting lemma identifies its zero-fibre quotient with a polynomial extension of a two-variable ring. An ambient polynomial identity supplies a critical point on another fibre, and a Jacobian argument is used to rule out a coordinate. Adjoining variables gives the higher-dimensional statements; the appendix records both coordinate maps.
Reading guide + panel report availableThe manuscript expresses the specified canonical map as multiplication in an invariant tensor algebra. An annihilator criterion reduces surjectivity to vanishing of symmetric multilinear forms on products. A directional-derivative injectivity lemma and two differentiation sequences surround an induction on the number of slots, yielding the stated degree range. Complete reducibility then supplies a representation embedding in the opposite direction.
Reading guide + panel report availableNo papers match this search.
Each reading guide includes the original manuscript, the proposed argument and a blank assessment space. Panel conclusions are on their own page.
Our evidence standards ↗Ten classical test cases help examine issue detection, repair and uncertainty, with model identities withheld during grading.
See the calibration experiment ↗
Help fund the model API usage, computational checks and reporting behind this archive. The papers, argument maps and review evidence are freely available to read.
Support on GoFundMe